Showing posts with label Prudential. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Prudential. Show all posts

Friday, June 13, 2014

Veteran's Story 4 - Steve Robinson, Prudential, R.I.P.

Stephen Robinson, Prudential - died
on Thursday, June 12.
Stephen Robinson, himself a veteran of 20 years of army service, became a formidable advocate for Veterans.

From 2010 to his death on June 12, 2014 he was vice president for External Veteran Affairs at Prudential Financial, where he focused on Veteran employment. His role was to advise the Prudential leadership on policies toward Veterans, expand programs, create partnerships and liaise with relevant agencies to improve access of Veterans to job opportunities.

He expanded Prudential's external network for Veteran initiatives by meeting with industry leaders in both the public and private sector, such as Veteran service organizations and legislators. He maintained Prudential as a leader in promoting education, training and employment for returning Veterans, in the tradition of Franklin D'Olier.

From 2001 to 2010, he was a retired Army officer and an independent advocate for Veterans and their families, working with several nonprofits to support service members and families. He served on the Department of Veterans Affairs Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Illnesses and was a special advisor on chemical and biological weapons exposures to Vietnam and Gulf War Veterans. Robinson was regularly called before Congressional committees to speak about military suicide, the mental health of Veterans, PTSD and the resiliency of the Armed Forces.

Previous to 2001, he had 20 years of service in conventional and Special Operations assignments including the 1/75th Ranger Battalion, 24th Infantry Division, 1/10th Special Forces, 8th Infantry Division, Ranger Instructor, 6th Ranger Training Brigade, Long Range Surveillance Detachment Team Leader in Korea, ROTC Instructor, and the Office of the Secretary of Defense, as briefer and analyst on health effects that arose out of the 1991 Persian Gulf war.  


From 1995 to 1998 he was at the University of West Florida. He prepared for college at Milton High School in Milton, Florida. Robinson also served on the board of directors for USO Metro Washington and as a military and veteran advisor for the Rockstar Energy Drink Mayhem Festival, and as a member of the board of advisers for the Call of Duty Endowment.

Saturday, June 8, 2013

VETS 2 | Pru's Programs

Prudential Financial's table at a veterans' job fair,
New Yorker Hotel, May 23, 2013. Photo by JT Marlin.
A veteran's getting hired shouldn't be a problem in a country with 27.3 million firms, right?

Well, 21.4 million of these firms are sole proprietorships with no employees.

That leaves 5.9 million firms, of which only 109,000 have more than 100 employees and only about 18,000 have more than 500 employees.

But of these 18,000 firms, how many are really eager to hire veterans? Also, how many of these firms are really appropriate for veterans to head for in expectation of a job?

One indicator is whether a company shows up at a veterans' job fair. I recently visited one in New York City and found that Newark-based Prudential Financial (Pru) had a booth there, one of maybe 25 firms seeking veterans for their payrolls.

Military Times recently examined 1,000 American companies to determine their openness to hiring veterans and providing support for them when they are hired. The publication reported on the top 53 companies and ranked Pru #27 (http://bit.ly/14V4bRQ).

Pru attained this high ranking because it has launched a variety of veterans’ initiatives:


  • The VETalent work-study program for veterans, in partnership with the nonprofit Workforce Opportunity Services, 
  • VETnet, a network of veteran employees of Prudential who can provide one another with mutual support and speak with a unified voice to the rest of the company and the outside community.
  • Philanthropic grants to veterans service organizations.
  • Original research on Veterans’ Employment Challenges, available here - and previously written up at this Blogspot (click or scroll down).
The strength of the company's veterans’ initiatives reflects Pru's commitment in assigning two senior employees to work exclusively on veterans’ affairs: 

  • Ray Weeks, VP for Veterans Initiatives, who manages the company's internal veterans programs, and
  • Steve Robinson, VP for External Veterans Affairs, who works on veterans' issues with outside organizations.

Pru hires veterans both because it's the right thing to do for those who have served and because it makes business sense. When asked not long ago how hiring veterans helps Pru as a company, Robinson said:
Veterans typically are the kind of people who - if you give them a mission and help them understand their role in its success - will go off and accomplish it without much supervision. Veterans are dedicated and have a demonstrated ability to work in arduous environments and take on complex tasks. The data also show that vets typically work harder, longer, don’t take as many sick days, and have the demonstrated ability to inculcate themselves into the culture and improve systems. 
For more on Pru's veterans initiatives, visit http://www.prudential.com/veterans.

Friday, May 17, 2013

JOBS | Problem #1 for Vets–Post-Discharge Work

What is the greatest challenge veterans say they face when they return to civilian life? Finding a job.  That was the conclusion of a careful survey by Prudential of veterans’ perceptions and experiences transitioning from military to civilian life. Nearly 70 percent of them  said “finding a job” is their greatest challenge.

Based on a poll of 1,845 Post-9/11 and Gulf War II-era Veterans, the survey showed that 64 percent experienced a difficult transition to civilian life. Prudential conducted the study in partnership with the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America to better understand veterans’ experiences and perceptions around finding civilian careers.

Raymond Weeks, vice president for Veterans Initiatives at Prudential, said at the time of the release of the report:

With tens of thousands of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans returning from service, the good news is that the nation is more focused than ever on helping veterans transition back into civilian careers. But with unemployment among veterans significantly higher than the population overall, particularly those under 30, the need to help get veterans on career paths has never been greater.
BLS Report on Veterans as of August 2012

The problems referred to by Mr. Weeks are shown in the annual Bureau of Labor Statistics report on the employment situation of veterans. 

The 2012 report shows a serious problem for veterans that served on active duty since 9/11, a cohort known as the Gulf War II era veterans. Unemployment among this group declined from the previous year but was still at a high 9.9 percent in 2012. The unemployment rate for all veterans was much lower, 7.0 percent.

One problem for Gulf War II vets is that 28 percent of them as of mid-2012 reported having a service-related disability, double the rate for all veterans. The report is based on the "household survey" of a sample of approximately 60,000 households. The monthly unemployment reports include questions relating to veterans in the surveyed households, so that the annual unemployment numbers are based on monthly data. However, the service-related disability questions are asked only in August of each year. 


Here are overall highlights of the 2012 survey: 
The unemployment rate for all male veterans declined by 1.4 percentage points to 6.9 percent in 2012. 
The rate for female veterans was little changed at 8.3 percent, higher than for men.
Veterans with a service-connected disability had an unemployment rate of 6.5 percent, comparable to veterans with no disability. 
One in three employed veterans with a service-connected disability worked in the public sector in August 2012, compared with one in five veterans with no disability. 
Gulf War-era II veterans who were current or past members of the reserve or National Guard had an unemployment rate of 7.2 percent in August 2012, approximately half the 13.7 percent rate for veterans who had not been members of the Reserve or National Guard. 
Gulf War-era II veterans who served in Iraq, Afghanistan, or both had an unemployment rate of 10.9 percent in August 2012, comparable to those who served elsewhere (11.3 percent).
In 2012, 21.2 million men and women in the civilian noninstitutional population ages 18 and over were veterans. 
Nearly half of them, 9.9 million people, served in World War II, the Korean War or the Vietnam War. 
In the survey, veterans are defined as men and women who have previously served on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces and who were civilians at the time the data were collected. 
Veterans are much more likely to be men and are significantly older than nonveterans. 
A total of 5.6 million veterans served during Gulf War era I (August 1990 to August 2001) or Gulf War era II (September 2001 forward). 
Another 5.7 million veterans served outside the designated wartime periods. 

Because age and other demographic differences affect labor force status, the next sections (unedited from the BLS release after the Gulf War era II section) focus on veterans by period of service. (See tables 1 and 2A.) 

Gulf War-Era II Veterans (Served Since 9-11)

In 2012, about 2.6 million of the nation's veterans had served during Gulf War era II. This is the group at greatest risk for unemployment. About 17 percent of these veterans were women, compared with 3 percent of veterans from World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam era. Almost half of all Gulf War-era II veterans were between the ages of 25 and 34. (See tables 1 and 2A.) Among male Gulf War-era II veterans, the unemployment rate fell by 2.5 percentage points to a still-high 9.5 percent from 2011 to 2012. The unemployment rate for female veterans, at a high 12.5 percent in 2012, was little different from the prior year. (See table 1.) In 2012, the unemployment rate for male Gulf War-era II veterans age 18 to 24 was 20.0 percent, higher than the rate for nonveterans of the same age group (16.4 percent). The rate for male veterans age 25 to 34 (10.4 percent) was also higher than the rate for their nonveteran counterparts (8.1 percent). For older age groups, the unemployment rates were little different for Gulf War-era II veterans and nonveterans. (See table 2B.) Veterans of Gulf War era II and nonveterans had similar occupational profiles in 2012 after accounting for gender. About one-third of the employed men in both groups worked in management and professional occupations, a higher proportion than in any other major occupational group. Among employed women, about 50 percent of Gulf War-era II veterans and 42 percent of nonveterans worked in management and professional occupations. (See table 4.) A higher proportion of employed Gulf War-era II veterans worked in the public sector in 2012 (25 percent) than employed nonveterans (14 percent). The federal government employed 14 percent of Gulf War-era II veterans, compared with about 2 percent of employed nonveterans. (See table 5.) In August 2012, approximately 35 percent of Gulf War-era II veterans reported that they had served in Iraq, Afghanistan, or both. (Some veterans did not report their location of service.) These veterans had an unemployment rate of 10.9 percent, not statistically different from Gulf War-era II veterans who served elsewhere (11.3 percent). (See table 9.) 

Gulf War-Era I Veterans 

For the 3.0 million veterans who served during Gulf War era I (August 1990 to August 2001), the proportion that were women (16 percent in 2012) was similar to that of Gulf War-era II veterans. About 88 percent of Gulf War-era I veterans were age 35 and over, compared with 40 percent of Gulf War-era II veterans. (See tables 1 and 2A.) In 2012, the unemployment rates for male and female Gulf War-era I veterans were 5.6 and 8.0 percent, respectively, lower than the rates for their Gulf War-era II veteran counterparts (9.5 and 12.5 percent, respectively). These differences in the unemployment rates reflect, at least in part, the older age profile of veterans who served during Gulf War era I. Younger workers--whether veterans or nonveterans--are more likely to be unemployed than older workers. Unemployment rates of Gulf War-era I veterans were little different from their nonveteran counterparts of the same age and gender groups. (See tables 2B and 2C.) 

Veterans of World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam Era 

In 2012, about 9.9 million veterans were estimated to have served during World War II, the Korean War, or the Vietnam era. All of these veterans were at least 55 years old, and two-thirds were at least 65 years old. Nearly all (97 percent) of these veterans were men. In 2012, nearly one-third of male veterans of these wartime periods were in the labor force, and their unemployment rate was 6.4 percent. Male veterans of these wartime periods had lower labor force participation rates than did male nonveterans in the same age categories, while unemployment rates were similar. (See tables 1 and 2B.) 

Veterans of Other Service Periods 

In 2012, about 5.7 million veterans had served on active duty during "other service periods," mainly between the Korean War and the Vietnam era, and between the Vietnam era and Gulf War era I. Because these veterans served between the major wartime periods, which span several decades, this group is concentrated in two age ranges. About 41 percent of these veterans were 45 to 54 years old, and another 38 percent were 65 years and over. (See table 2A.) Nine in 10 veterans of other service periods were men. Among most age groups, male veterans of service periods between the designated wartime periods had unemployment rates that were little different than those of male nonveterans. (See tables 1 and 2B.) 

Veterans with a Service-Connected Disability 

In August 2012, about 3.0 million veterans, or 14 percent of the total, had a service-connected disability. (Some veterans did not report whether they had a service-connected disability.) Veterans with a service-connected disability are assigned a disability rating by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. Department of Defense. Ratings range from 0 to 100 percent, in increments of 10 percentage points, depending on the severity of the condition. (See table 6.) Among veterans with a service-connected disability, nearly 4 in 10 reported a disability rating of less than 30 percent, while about 3 in 10 had a rating of 60 percent or higher. In August 2012, veterans with a service-connected disability rating of less than 30 percent were more than twice as likely to be in the labor force as those with a rating of 60 percent or higher (58.1 and 26.1 percent, respectively). Among veterans who served during Gulf War era II, nearly 3 in 10 (712,000) reported having a service-connected disability. Of these, 70.3 percent were in the labor force in August 2012, compared with 87.0 percent of veterans from this period with no service-connected disability. Among Gulf War-era II veterans, the unemployment rate of those with a disability was 8.0 percent, not statistically different from those with no disability (12.5 percent). In August 2012, about 17 percent (532,000) of veterans who served during Gulf War era I reported a service-connected disability. Their labor force participation rate (72.6 percent) was lower than the rate for veterans from the era who did not have a disability (87.8 percent). Unemployment rates for Gulf War-era I veterans with (5.0 percent) and without (6.3 percent) service-connected disabilities were little different. Among the 1.3 million veterans with a service-connected disability from World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam era, 21.1 percent were in the labor force in August 2012, compared with 32.2 percent of veterans from these periods who did not have a service-connected disability. The unemployment rate of veterans with a disability from these wartime periods was 6.1 percent, little different from their counterparts with no disability (5.5 percent). Veterans with a service-connected disability from other service periods had a labor force participation rate of 54.0 percent in August 2012, compared with 56.0 percent for veterans with no disability from these periods. Among veterans from other service periods, the unemployment rates of those with and without service-connected disabilities were similar--6.5 and 6.4 percent, respectively. Regardless of period of service, many veterans with a service-connected disability worked in the public sector. In August 2012, 34 percent of employed veterans with a disability worked in federal, state, or local government, compared with 19 percent of veterans with no disability and 14 percent of nonveterans. The federal government employed 19 percent of veterans with a disability, compared with 7 percent of veterans with no disability and 2 percent of employed nonveterans. (See table 7.) 

Reserve and National Guard Membership 

Nearly 30 percent of both Gulf War-era I and Gulf War-era II veterans were reported to be current or past members of the Reserve or National Guard. Among Gulf War-era II veterans, those who were current or past members of the Reserve or National Guard had an unemployment rate of 7.2 percent in August 2012, lower than the rate for those who had never been members (13.7 percent). Gulf War-era II veterans who were current or past members of the Reserve or National Guard had a higher labor force participation rate than those who had never been members (85.8 and 78.7 percent, respectively). For veterans of Gulf War-era I, labor force participation rates and unemployment rates were similar for members and nonmembers. (See table 8.) 

Tables of Data from the August 2012 BLS Report on Jobs for Veterans